The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) have proposed a controversial new rule under the Trump administration that may fundamentally alter the landscape of nonprofit education. Schools including private K-12 institutions, colleges, and universities could face losing their tax-exempt status if they incorporate race as a criterion in any of their student programs.
This rule, announced on September 3, 2026, aims to be implemented by May 31, 2027, pending a public comment period and potential legal challenges. Legal experts anticipate that the sweeping implications could lead to extensive court battles.
Understanding the Proposed Changes
The proposed regulation stipulates that private educational institutions will not qualify for tax-exempt status if they operate any program that discriminates based on race, color, or national origin. Although the exact definition of “discriminate” remains unspecified, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has indicated that diversity-focused initiatives may be targeted.
This rule affects a wide range of programs, from academic courses and athletic programs to scholarships and admissions policies. However, religious schools prioritizing admissions based on religion and public universities are exempt from this rule. Nonetheless, the rule’s language might extend to foundations providing scholarships to public university students.
At present, the proposal leaves many questions unanswered, particularly concerning its precise application and implications.
Keith Bedford/The Boston Globe via Getty Images
The IRS projects that this rule will impact approximately 18,000 private schools, affecting 750,000 students. Nonprofit schools could face financial strain if they lose tax exemptions that help reduce income and property taxes and attract donations. This could potentially lead to increased tuition fees as colleges and universities grapple with existing financial pressures.
Rationale Behind the Proposal
The Trump administration’s proposal is rooted in a specific interpretation of racial discrimination, which asserts that racial preferences, even when intended to address historical injustices, constitute grounds for terminating tax-exempt status. This viewpoint is supported by legal precedents, including the U.S. Supreme Court’s Bob Jones University v. United States decision, which allowed the IRS to revoke a university’s tax-exempt status based on discriminatory practices.
Additionally, the Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard ruling in 2023 found that race-based admissions policies at federally funded colleges and universities violate the equal protection clause of the Constitution.
Authority and Legal Challenges
Concerns have been raised about the federal government’s authority to enact this rule. Various educational organizations, including EdTrust and the American Association of University Professors, have voiced their opposition. Legal experts have argued that the proposed rule may be illegal, citing recent court decisions that have limited federal authority over educational policy changes.
Furthermore, questions persist over whether the IRS’s interpretation of congressional intent aligns with legal precedents. Many scholars argue that the proposed regulation misinterprets previous Supreme Court cases regarding tax-exempt status for schools.
Melissa Sue Gerrits/Getty Images
Potential Impacts and Future Developments
The proposed rule could lead nonprofit educational institutions to reconsider programs addressing past discrimination to avoid risking their tax-exempt status. Broader implications could extend to other nonprofit organizations as well. The IRS is expected to review public comments submitted by November 3, 2026, potentially leading to revisions before finalizing the rule.
If the rule proceeds as planned, it is anticipated that extensive litigation could delay or hinder its implementation, leaving the future of diversity initiatives in nonprofit education uncertain.
