As the gig economy continues to expand, the challenges and dynamics it presents are increasingly capturing the attention of policymakers. A case in point is Seattle, where a recent law aimed at improving the earnings of gig workers has sparked significant discussion. This legislation mandates that delivery apps pay their drivers a minimum rate per task, combining per-minute and per-mile compensation to ensure a minimum of $5 per delivery.
The primary objective of Seattle’s policy is to elevate the earnings of gig workers, who frequently lack the benefits and securities of traditional employment. However, a study conducted by labor economists, including researchers from Carnegie Mellon University, reveals unexpected outcomes. Despite a substantial increase in base pay per delivery, the overall monthly earnings of drivers showed little to no improvement.
No Significant Change in Monthly Earnings
Using comprehensive data from Gridwise, an app that helps gig workers track their income, researchers compared the earnings of Seattle-based drivers with those in other parts of Washington state. The analysis showed that while the base pay per delivery in Seattle nearly doubled, from around $5 to over $12, the intended benefits were neutralized. This was largely due to a decrease in customer tips and a reduction in the number of deliveries completed by drivers.
After the implementation of the new pay rule, delivery platforms introduced new fees for consumers. For instance, DoorDash added a $5 “regulatory response fee” for Seattle orders, which led to reduced tipping from customers. In some cases, such as with Uber Eats, the option for tipping during checkout was entirely removed, further diminishing the drivers’ earnings.
Moreover, the competition among drivers intensified, resulting in fewer deliveries per driver. Although drivers continued to log in and search for work, they spent more time waiting for tasks. This increase in waiting time, coupled with the need to travel longer distances between deliveries without compensation, effectively canceled out the higher pay per delivery.
Understanding Gig Market Dynamics
In contrast to traditional jobs, where a minimum wage hike leads to higher pay for retained workers, the gig economy operates differently. There is no hiring or firing; anyone can join the platform and compete for tasks. When pay per delivery increases, the allure of gig work attracts more drivers. However, the higher operational costs are transferred to consumers, leading to fewer orders and lower tips, thus prolonging the wait time for delivery opportunities.
The study’s findings underscore a critical aspect of gig markets—while existing drivers in Seattle saw a decrease in deliveries, new drivers entered the market, quickly taking over the majority of delivery tasks within a few months.
Implications for Future Policies
Seattle’s experience highlights the complexities of regulating the gig economy. While the intent to improve gig workers’ earnings is valid, direct regulation of per-task pay may not be sufficient. Limiting the number of active drivers, akin to the taxi medallion system, could be one approach, but it may compromise the flexibility inherent in gig work.
Furthermore, platform behaviors, such as restoring tipping options, could play a significant role in enhancing drivers’ earnings. Some jurisdictions, including New York City, are already moving towards such changes.
Despite these challenges, several other cities, including Chicago and states like Colorado and Minnesota, are exploring similar regulatory frameworks. As they proceed, Seattle’s experience serves as a cautionary tale, emphasizing the need for a nuanced approach to gig economy regulation.
Craig F. Walker/The Boston Globe via Getty Images
Lindsey Nicholson/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images
