In a poignant visit to Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, Senate President Ben Albritton confronted the tragic memories of a mass shooting that claimed 17 lives seven years ago. As a result, the NRA member’s emotional experience could heavily influence a legislative debate over the legal age for purchasing long guns in Florida.
Albritton, deeply moved by his visit, reflected on the impact of meeting families like that of Tom and Gena Hoyer, whose son, Luke, was one of the victims. This personal connection has prompted him to reconsider the implications of rolling back gun restrictions enacted after the Parkland tragedy.
“You can’t do that and not be affected profoundly,” Albritton shared, becoming emotional as he spoke to reporters. “I have to do the best I can based on experience, based on my values. It includes Luke Hoyer. That’s all I’ve got to say about it.”
At the heart of this session’s legislative agenda is the decision on whether to adjust the age requirement for buying long guns from 21 back to 18. While the House is moving forward with the bill, Albritton’s stance will be pivotal, especially given the Senate’s three stalled similar proposals.
For the third consecutive year, conservatives advocating for the Second Amendment have sought to lower the age restriction, despite judicial backing for its constitutionality. They argue that the restrictions were enacted in haste following Parkland, and that it is time for a more measured approach.
Rep. Tyler Sirois, a major proponent of the House bill, emphasized the need to remove emotions from policy discussions, asserting that the age limit would not have prevented the systemic failures at Parkland. “This is a matter of public policy, and we have to take emotions out,” stated Sirois.
Opponents, including victims’ families, view the proposed legislation as an affront to the community’s efforts post-Parkland. Debbie Hixon, a Broward County School Board member and widow of a victim, expressed her dismay: “This feels like salt being poured into an open wound.”
The tragic event involved a 19-year-old former student who, with an AR-15 type rifle, took 17 lives and injured many more. In its aftermath, lawmakers swiftly enacted measures, including raising the gun purchase age, banning bump stocks, and enhancing school security, all of which have been credited with reducing school gun violence.
Rep. Dan Daley, opposing the age rollback, noted the effectiveness of these measures and highlighted the prevalence of 18-20-year-olds in school shootings. Meanwhile, Rep. Michelle Salzman, a bill co-sponsor, argued that the 2018 law was a reaction to fear and anxiety, and emphasized the need for mental health access.
Florida Channel
Rep. Michelle Salzman, R-Pensacola, is leading an effort to repeal a key provision of the post-Parkland gun law that prohibits people under age 21 from buying rifles and long guns.
The House’s proposal is advancing towards a vote, with expectations of a party-line decision. Most Republicans support the measure, except Rep. Hillary Cassel, who notably shifted from the Democratic Party after reelection.
Albritton’s predecessor, Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, previously halted similar House proposals to prioritize mental health services. The age limit was constitutionally upheld by the 11th Circuit Court, but current Attorney General James Uthmeier has indicated he would not defend it in future challenges.
Albritton remains cautious, stating, “I do not want to be impulsive,” as his legal team evaluates the situation.
Originally Published:
