Aquittal Raises Questions About Use of Force in Police Shooting

A jury’s decision to acquit former Okaloosa County deputy Eddie Duran of manslaughter has sparked intense debate over the use of force in law enforcement. Duran was charged after fatally shooting 23-year-old U.S. Air Force Senior Airman Roger Fortson in his own home on May 3, 2024. The verdict has left many questioning the circumstances under which officers perceive threats and the legal justification for using deadly force.
As reported by ABC News, the jury deliberated for over two hours before delivering their not guilty verdict. Duran’s defense centered on the assertion that officers are not trained to wait until a firearm is aimed directly at them before responding with gunfire. Duran, who was terminated following the incident, maintained that he acted out of fear for his life, stating, “When I saw his eyes, I saw aggression. I’m standing there thinking I’m about to get shot; I’m about to die. It is him or me at this point.”
During the trial, body camera footage was presented showing Fortson opening the door with a gun at his side, aimed at the floor. The prosecution argued that Fortson posed no threat, emphasizing that his weapon was not raised. Assistant state attorney Mark Alderman noted, “There was no threat. The gun was pointed at the ground,” and highlighted that Fortson’s left arm was raised defensively when Duran fired.
The defense argued that the immediate presence of a firearm constituted an imminent threat, justifying the use of deadly force. Attorney Rod Smith argued, “Do you have to wait? Do we ever train people that they have to wait until the gun is pointed at them? No.” He emphasized that officers are trained to respond to potential threats without hesitation.
Civil rights attorney Ben Crump, representing Fortson’s family, expressed the family’s devastation over the verdict. In a statement, Crump said, “Roger was a 23-year-old Senior Airman who chose to serve this country, and he was shot and killed at the door of his own home. His family has lived with that loss every day for more than two years, and this verdict is incredibly hard for them.”
Fortson’s family plans to pursue a civil rights case in federal court, seeking accountability for what they see as an unjustified use of force. The case continues to stir public debate on the balance between police protocol and the rights of individuals, particularly in communities of color.
Related Articles
Roger Fortson: Mother Says Cop Keeps Delaying Criminal Trial
Roger Fortson’s Killer Cop Charged






