View the entire Explainers collection
Immigration remains a contentious issue in the United States, with legal battles and public demonstrations marking the landscape. At the heart of these debates is the immigration court system, which faces scrutiny for its handling of deportation cases. These courts are distinct from other judicial entities, raising questions about their function and authority.
What are Immigration Courts?
Immigration courts operate as administrative bodies under the U.S. Department of Justice, handling cases concerning the removal of noncitizens. Unlike courts under the judicial branch, these courts are dedicated to immigration-related issues and have a backlog of approximately 3.5 million cases. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) targets specific immigrants, prioritizing those with criminal records for deportation, as affirmed by a Supreme Court decision in 2021.
Who Participates in Immigration Court?
Immigration judges, part of the Executive Office for Immigration Review, conduct hearings. These judges, appointed through a career hiring process, exercise independent judgment but are supervised by a chief immigration judge. DHS attorneys represent the government in these proceedings, while immigrants must secure their own legal representation, as the government does not typically provide attorneys.
Understanding Removal Hearings
Removal hearings determine if a noncitizen can be deported. These civil proceedings differ from criminal trials, lacking a jury and entailing fewer rights for immigrants. Hearings may occur in person or via video conference, and they are generally public. Judges often issue oral decisions at the conclusion of these brief sessions, though complex cases may require written decisions.
Eligibility for a Removal Hearing
Most immigrants in the U.S. are entitled to a removal hearing, although DHS can opt for expedited removal in certain cases, such as recent border crossers. The expedited process allows for quick deportation without a formal hearing unless the immigrant demonstrates a credible fear of persecution. Some legal challenges have arisen against the expedited process, especially regarding its implementation.
Notice and Rights in Removal Proceedings
When DHS seeks to remove an immigrant, it issues a “notice to appear,” detailing the reasons for removal and the immigrant’s rights. In court, judges first verify claims of U.S. citizenship and assess the grounds for removal. Immigrants can dispute government allegations and seek relief, such as asylum, if they fear persecution.
Legal Framework in Immigration Court
Immigration courts follow the Immigration and Nationality Act and related regulations. Judges can admit any relevant evidence, though they do not have authority over the constitutionality of the Act itself. Recent court rulings have reduced the deference given to executive agencies, impacting how immigration laws are interpreted.
Appeals Process in Immigration Cases
Decisions by immigration judges can be appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals, and further to the circuit courts. The appeal rate varies, with fewer than 10% of immigration decisions being appealed in recent years. Circuit courts, separate from the DOJ system, handle these appeals, providing another layer of judicial review.
