Michigan Attorney General Reverses Budget Cuts, Citing Unconstitutionality
Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has issued a formal opinion that reverses budget cuts made by the GOP-led House Appropriations Committee, stating that the process used violated the state Constitution’s separation of powers and presentment clauses. This decision allows the state to continue spending on programs that were previously cut, including prenatal and newborn programs, museums, symphonies, and funds for Flint water crisis recovery.
Key Points:
- Nessel’s opinion deems the committee’s actions as unconstitutional, as it granted veto authority to one legislative body over a budget passed by both chambers and signed by the governor.
- The $645 million in cuts from the current budget affected various essential programs and services, prompting Senate Democrats to seek the attorney general’s opinion.
- House Republican leaders plan to challenge the opinion, labeling it as politically motivated, while Nessel’s office and Governor Whitmer’s legal advisor affirm the availability of funds for expenditure.
Senate Majority Leader Winnie Brinks criticized the House Republicans’ unilateral budget cuts, calling them callous and unfair. The legal advisor to Governor Gretchen Whitmer confirmed that the funds are now accessible for their intended purposes, aligning with Nessel’s opinion.
Despite the impending legal challenge from House Republicans, the opinion stands, allowing state departments and agencies to utilize the allocated funds as initially planned. This decision ensures the continuity of vital services and programs for Michigan residents.
