The U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, once again, finds itself in the spotlight, not for current events but for a scandal that took place over three decades ago. This historic cheating scandal has resurfaced, drawing attention to Democratic U.S. Representative Mikie Sherrill’s military records, now the subject of political controversy.
Decades after the scandal, the 1990s cheating incident at the Naval Academy has once again made headlines. This time, it concerns the release of military records belonging to Rep. Mikie Sherrill, who was a midshipman at the time and is currently a gubernatorial candidate in New Jersey. The National Archives’ release of these records was denounced by Rep. Robert Garcia as an “illegal and likely politically motivated disclosure” as reported by Politico.
Garcia, a Democrat from California and a member of the House Oversight Committee, has called for an investigation into the matter, suggesting that the records’ release unjustly implicated Sherrill in the cheating scandal. Sherrill, who served as a Navy helicopter pilot, told The New Jersey Globe that she was barred from walking with her classmates at her 1994 graduation due to her decision not to report fellow midshipmen involved in the scandal.
Maryland Governor Wes Moore expressed his criticism of the unredacted records’ leak on the social media platform X, stating it was “a betrayal of everyone who’s ever worn the uniform.”
Examination Cheating Incident
The scandal at the Naval Academy began when a midshipman reportedly obtained a master copy of the Electrical Engineering 311 exam days before it was administered on December 14, 1992. According to The Baltimore Sun, copies of the test were sold in Bancroft Hall, home to around 4,000 midshipmen. The faculty was criticized for failing to adhere to proper exam duplication procedures.
Widespread Involvement
In the mandatory engineering course exam, approximately 700 juniors participated, but over 130 midshipmen were implicated in the cheating, with around 80 admitting to it, as reported by The Sun. Despite the scale of the incident, only 29 midshipmen faced potential expulsion, and a new test was not administered.
Honor Code at Stake
The Naval Academy’s honor code, which strictly prohibits lying, cheating, or stealing, was severely tested by the scandal. Cheating, considered a grave offense, threatened the academy’s mission and the discipline expected of future Naval officers. This was not the first such incident; a major cheating scandal had occurred in 1974 involving “crib sheets” in a navigation course exam.
Limited Punishment
The midshipman identified as the exam supplier was cleared when a witness refused to testify, citing legal advice, and alleged a $15,000 bribe offer to resign, as reported by The Sun. Six midshipmen and the witness faced honor violation convictions, while four of the original 28 cases were dismissed. An advisory board later called for a comprehensive overhaul of the honor code.
Leadership Consequences
Rear Adm. Thomas C. Lynch was reassigned after overseeing the academy during the scandal. Arriving in June 1991, Lynch faced criticism for his handling of the cheating allegations. Navy tradition places the ultimate responsibility for misconduct on the senior officer in charge.
©2025 Baltimore Sun. Visit baltimoresun.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
