Michigan Voters Face Decision on Constitutional Convention
In the upcoming 2026 election, Michigan voters will have a crucial decision to make – whether to convene a constitutional convention to rewrite the state’s entire constitution. This question, known as a “Con-Con,” appears on the Michigan ballot every 16 years, offering voters a chance to shape the future of their state.
The Stakes Are High
Aside from the decision on a constitutional convention, Michigan voters will also be casting their votes for key positions such as governor, secretary of state, attorney general, and a U.S. Senate seat. Additionally, the entire state House, state Senate, and Michigan’s Congressional delegation will be up for grabs. The political landscape is set for a potential transformation, with various ballot questions also in consideration.
A Historical Context
Michigan’s current constitution dates back to 1963, and voters have rejected the idea of a constitutional convention three times since then. However, given the current state of politics and society, the outcome this time around remains uncertain. The decision could have far-reaching implications for the state’s governance and future direction.
Expert Insights
Eric Lupher, President of the non-partisan Citizens Research Council of Michigan (CRC), and Nancy Kaffer, Editorial Page Editor at the Detroit Free Press, recently discussed the potential benefits and risks of a Con-Con on the It’s Just Politics podcast. Their insights shed light on the complexities and considerations involved in such a significant decision.
