Preservationists Persist with Lawsuit Against Trump’s White House Ballroom
In the aftermath of a shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, preservationists are steadfast in their legal challenge against President Donald Trump’s proposed $400 million ballroom at the White House. Despite a request from the Department of Justice, the lawsuit remains active.
President Trump and his allies have cited the recent incident at the media event as evidence of the need for enhanced security measures at large gatherings, advocating for the new ballroom to mitigate such vulnerabilities. The National Trust for Historic Preservation, however, remains firm in its opposition, having filed the lawsuit last December following the demolition of the East Wing to accommodate the new ballroom.
In response to the Department of Justice’s suggestion to withdraw the lawsuit, Trust attorney Gregory Craig emphasized that “the Constitution and multiple federal statutes require Congress to authorize construction of a ballroom on White House grounds, and that Congress has not done so.” Hence, the legal issues remain unchanged despite recent events.
The Justice Department has indicated its intent to seek dismissal of the lawsuit, but a spokesperson has yet to comment further. The Trust argues that Trump’s initiative lacked proper authorization from federal entities and Congress, challenging the project’s legitimacy.
While Trump claims the ballroom is funded through private contributions, public funds are allocated for an underground bunker and security enhancements. The project’s progress has been a point of contention, with a federal appeals court recently allowing the continuation of the project. However, a lower court judge has blocked above-ground construction pending further review, with a hearing scheduled for June 5.
For more insights, connect with Meg Kinnard at http://x.com/MegKinnardAP
