CHARLOTTE, N.C. (AP) — The courtroom clash between NASCAR and two racing teams escalated as mediation efforts failed. The high-profile antitrust dispute saw team owner Michael Jordan finding some of the testimonies incredulous, as legal proceedings edged closer to a trial.
Jeffrey Kessler, representing the racing teams, stated post-hearing, “Today’s hearing confirmed the facts of NASCAR’s monopolistic practices and showed NASCAR for who they are — retaliatory bullies who would rather focus on personal attacks and distract from the facts.” He emphasized the unity and commitment of his clients, 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports, in their pursuit of a fair competitive environment. The teams are determined to hold NASCAR accountable in court.
The legal battle originated a year ago when 23XI Racing, co-owned by Jordan and Denny Hamlin, alongside Bob Jenkins-owned Front Row Motorsports, opted out of signing new charter agreements. These charters are crucial to the NASCAR business model, securing revenue and race accessibility. Without them, the teams face potential shutdown.
Despite calls for resolution from other teams, three mediation attempts have failed, highlighting the significant divide between the parties. The trial is set for December 1.
U.S. District Judge Kenneth Bell, joined by ex-NBA executive Jeffrey Mishkin, led the mediation earlier this week. While thanking both sides for their good faith efforts, NASCAR’s request to dismiss the lawsuit was a focal point of the hearing, as was their attempt to limit claimed damages.
NASCAR accused the teams of orchestrating “classic cartel behavior” after receiving less favorable terms than other teams under charter extensions signed late last year. This argument appeared to falter during the session.
The league asserted that teams can compete in other racing formats like IndyCar and F1. However, Kessler countered the feasibility of these options, likening a switch from NASCAR to IndyCar to a Major League Baseball team moving to the minors, noting the disparity in prize money and television ratings.
NASCAR’s portrayal of Chip Ganassi Racing’s sale to Trackhouse Racing as an opportunity for Ganassi to expand in IndyCar was challenged, as Ganassi has consistently been a leading team in IndyCar for over thirty years.
Jordan, along with Hamlin and Jenkins, expressed skepticism during the proceedings, particularly when NASCAR claimed it provides a higher revenue percentage to teams than F1 does. Jordan refrained from commenting to the media afterward.
The initial charter agreements, in effect from 2016 to 2020, automatically extended through the end of 2024. NASCAR argues these charters have enhanced team equity by over $1 billion, but team owners are advocating for reforms.
Initially, 23XI and Front Row Motorsports secured a preliminary injunction to compete as chartered teams, but it was later rescinded, forcing them to race as “open” teams as the season concludes on November 2.
Kessler contends that damages should be calculated from the 2021 season, citing 28 restrictive clauses that hinder teams from participating in similar motorsports. NASCAR acknowledged the presence of at least one such clause since 2021.
Judge Bell was expected to hear from expert witnesses but has set two court dates in November, following Hamlin’s Cup Series title race in Phoenix.
___
AP auto racing: https://apnews.com/hub/auto-racing
