Press "Enter" to skip to content

New Mexico Court Orders Meta to Pay $567M for Youth Platform Harms

In a significant legal development, Meta, the parent company of Instagram and Facebook, has been ordered by a New Mexico court to pay $567 million as part of a landmark case addressing the impact of its platforms on young users. This ruling, delivered by Judge Bryan Biedscheid, is part of the second phase of a trial focusing on the detrimental effects of social media on children’s well-being.

The majority of the awarded sum, $420 million, has been allocated for treatment services aimed at supporting young individuals. Additional funds will be directed toward awareness programs, prevention, and screening services over the next five years.

This recent financial penalty adds to the $375 million in civil charges previously levied against Meta. Earlier in March, jurors concluded that the company had knowingly compromised children’s mental health and obscured instances of child sexual exploitation on its platforms. Prosecutors are urging for substantial changes within Meta, including the enhancement of age verification, limiting addictive features, and strengthening privacy settings to prevent exploitation.

Despite the hefty financial implications, this $942 million cumulative penalty represents a minor fraction of Meta’s annual profit, which was reported to be approximately $60 billion in 2025. The market reaction to the New Mexico court’s decision was muted, with Meta’s stock experiencing a slight dip of less than half a percent, closing at $589.44.

New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez emphasized the broader implications of the ruling, stating, “Today’s decision is a victory for every parent who has worried about what social media is doing to their child and every child who deserves to grow up safer online.” Meanwhile, Meta has announced its intention to appeal, maintaining its stance on user safety and transparency regarding challenges in managing harmful content.

The Potential Transformation of Meta’s Platforms

The court has mandated that Meta incorporate clear informational displays on Facebook and Instagram to educate users about its safety features and tools for addressing inappropriate content. These updates, alongside an educational campaign in New Mexico, will be subject to state review.

Federal children’s privacy laws, such as the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), restrict Meta from applying age-verification processes for users under 13. The court recognized that enforcing such measures exclusively on Meta would be unfair and detrimental. Nonetheless, Meta is tasked with enhancing its age verification tools in New Mexico, employing artificial intelligence to deduce user ages and developing a predictive model for users under 13.

Meta must also implement a system to confirm the ages of its New Mexico users suspected to be under 13 and apply corresponding restrictions. Furthermore, the company is required to partner with educational institutions or child safety organizations to establish a reporting portal for identifying underage users. Meta is obligated to report progress biannually on its adherence to these measures.

Upcoming Legal Challenges for Meta

Meta is preparing for an upcoming trial in federal court in Oakland, California, where it will confront the first wave of lawsuits from 29 states accusing it of contributing to the youth mental health crisis. These cases claim that Meta’s platform features are intentionally addictive for younger users.

In addition, Meta, alongside other tech giants such as TikTok, Snap, and YouTube, faces legal action from families alleging that the platforms contributed to the deaths of four teenagers through “years of escalating harms.”

Laura Edelson, an assistant professor at Northeastern University, commented on the broader implications of the New Mexico ruling, stating, “America is not going to pass a law that bans social media. But if companies like Meta know they’re causing harm to users by product design, the states are finally finding a way to rein this in.”

____

This story has been updated to correct the judge’s last name to Biedscheid, not Biedcheid. ___

Ortutay reported from Oakland, California, and Yu from Phoenix. Associated Press writer Mikella Schuettler in Phoenix contributed. Schuettler is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.