In a significant move, the Trump administration revealed its decision on July 21, 2026, to withhold a combined total of over $1 billion in federal healthcare funds from California and Minnesota. This decision involves $867 million for California and $200 million for Minnesota.
The federal authorities indicated that the withholding is due to insufficient proof from the states regarding the authenticity of certain medical claims. These claims pertain to services under Medicaid programs for low-income individuals, including in-home care.
Medicaid officials mentioned that the withheld funds could be restored if the states provide the necessary documentation. Historically, it is uncommon for Medicaid officials to take such immediate action, as cooperative audits with states to investigate fraud are the norm, which can take an extended period of time.
This move marks the second occasion in 2026 that the administration has deferred Medicaid funds due to alleged fraudulent activity. Democratic governors of the affected states, including California and Minnesota, have criticized the administration’s decisions, describing them as politically motivated attacks.
From the perspective of a historian of social policy, there’s a longstanding trend of using fraud and abuse narratives to undermine Medicaid. The Trump administration’s current strategies appear to fit this pattern, potentially aiming to delegitimize and reduce funding for the program.
Medicaid and the Safety Net
The decision to restrict Medicaid funding forms part of a broader strategy by the Trump administration to reduce federal support for safety net programs.
A pivotal tax-and-spending bill signed by Trump in July 2025 has significantly altered Medicaid eligibility by imposing work requirements, leading to a reduction of nearly $1 trillion in federal spending over the next decade.
Projections suggest that these changes could increase the number of uninsured Americans by nearly 12 million by 2034, adding to the 28 million already without health insurance in 2025. By the middle of 2026, more than 3 million individuals had lost their insurance coverage due to modifications in the Affordable Care Act.
Fraud Prevention Initiatives
In February 2026, the administration launched a new anti-fraud initiative, Comprehensive Regulations to Uncover Suspicious Healthcare, led by Vice President JD Vance and Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. This initiative, commonly referred to as CRUSH, aims to tackle fraud by withholding funds in cases of suspected abuse.
“CMS is done trying to catch fraudsters with their hands in the cookie jar,” remarked Dr. Mehmet Oz, the CMS administrator. “Instead, we’re padlocking the jar and letting them starve.”
While Medicaid fraud is a genuine issue costing billions annually, the administration’s approach is perceived as part of a larger effort to portray Medicaid as inherently wasteful and question the state’s ability to manage federal funds effectively.
Christopher Juhn/Anadolu via Getty Images
The Evolution of Medicaid Oversight
Since its inception in 1965 as part of President Lyndon B. Johnson’s “Great Society” reforms, Medicaid has provided millions with health coverage. However, it initially lacked strong oversight mechanisms, leading to potential abuse.
The complexity of Medicaid, funded by both federal and state governments, has historically allowed for questionable billing practices. The 1970s witnessed numerous Medicaid scandals involving improper billing by healthcare providers.
In response, significant legislative measures were enacted, including the Medicare-Medicaid Anti-Fraud and Abuse Amendments of 1977, which established the Medicaid Fraud Control Units to investigate and prosecute fraud.
Despite the focus on provider-related fraud, Medicaid has often been at the center of political debates over social spending and government dependency. The narrative of fraud has frequently been used to justify spending cuts and stricter eligibility requirements.
O’Halloran/Library of Congress via Getty Images
Throughout its history, Medicaid has been a focal point of discussions surrounding social benefits and their perceived misuse. The Trump administration’s recent actions appear to continue this trend, using allegations of fraud to question the integrity and efficacy of state-run Medicaid programs.
