Press "Enter" to skip to content

Arizona Lawmakers Face Tax Cut and Prop. 123 Challenges in New Session

As the Arizona Legislature prepares to reconvene, lawmakers are poised to address pressing issues that, while not directly related to school vouchers, are indirectly influenced by them. The political dynamics are such that both parties are seeking to intertwine school voucher debates with their legislative agendas.

Tax Cut Conformity

A crucial topic for the Arizona Legislature is the alignment of state tax policies with recent federal tax reductions. Earlier this year, significant federal tax cuts were enacted under President Trump’s administration. Democratic Governor Katie Hobbs is advocating for tax cuts aimed at middle-class families in Arizona, reflecting some elements of the federal legislation. More details can be found here.

However, Gov. Hobbs has not supported the adoption of all proposed tax cuts. In contrast, Republicans, including state Sen. John Kavanagh (R-Fountain Hills), argue for full conformity with the federal tax cuts. Kavanagh noted, “The governor wants to do just individual tax breaks, which is about $220 million, and the Republicans would like to do the full $440 million, which includes businesses.”

Republican lawmakers express concern that differing tax structures at the state and federal levels could create confusion for taxpayers. This issue is anticipated to be a priority for the legislative session.

To offset potential revenue losses, Governor Hobbs has suggested reducing Arizona’s universal private school voucher program, known as Empowerment Scholarship Accounts (ESA). More on her proposal can be read here. However, this proposal faces opposition from GOP lawmakers, who are keen on integrating ESA protections into discussions surrounding other fiscal policies, such as Proposition 123.

Proposition 123

This legislative session will also focus on whether to put an extension of Proposition 123 on the ballot. Prop. 123 is designed to fund public schools using state land trust revenue. Last year, failing to advance it to voters resulted in significant expenses for the legislature. More information is available here.

Sen. Kavanagh emphasized the importance of addressing this issue, stating, “We didn’t send it to the voters for renewal and we had to backfill it. We don’t want to do that again this year, but a lot of members want to have some protections for ESAs, along with that Prop. 123, which goes to district schools.”

The debate centers on whether protections for private school vouchers should be included in the Prop. 123 extension proposal. While Republicans aim to link the extension to enhanced ESA protections, Democrats prefer addressing voucher issues separately, leading to a legislative impasse.