Arizona State University (ASU) finds itself at the center of a debate following the release of controversial videos by Accuracy in Media, portraying professors discussing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. Despite the absence of direct DEI language in their policies, the university is accused of maintaining the spirit of such initiatives.
Accuracy in Media, known for its undercover investigations, released videos featuring individuals posing as prospective students questioning ASU professors about the university’s commitment to inclusion and diversity. The edited footage suggests that these principles still influence program development at ASU, echoing similar videos that have previously led to personnel changes at other institutions.
State Press reporter Andi Ruiz covered the story, highlighting the confrontational nature of these videos. Ruiz embarked on an exploration of Accuracy in Media’s tactics, describing their efforts as “undercover investigations” probing the endurance of DEI policies at universities nationwide.
Undercover Tactics and Accusations
The organization’s president, Adam Guillette, appears in the videos, accusing professors of illegal activity. He stated, “Our investigators met with administrator after administrator who bragged to us about continuing to push these radical ideas even when they’re against the law.” This approach raises questions about the organization’s motives and methods.
Ruiz sought clarity on ASU’s stance regarding DEI policies. An ASU spokesperson referred to the Arizona Border Regents Policy Manual and the state constitution, emphasizing the university’s compliance with federal law and its non-discriminatory admissions and scholarship practices.
Ethical Considerations
Ruiz consulted Stephen Adler, director of NYU’s Ethics in Journalism initiative, who characterized Accuracy in Media’s approach as political activism rather than journalism. This distinction is crucial for understanding the videos’ context and potential impact.
In conversations with Guillette, Ruiz questioned the necessity and ethicality of the organization’s methods, given the Society of Professional Journalists’ guidelines discouraging deceptive practices unless essential. Guillette defended their approach, asserting the public’s right to know about hidden DEI policies.
Impact on ASU Faculty
Professors Chandra Crudup and Rebecca Loftus, featured in the videos, have not faced employment changes at ASU. Both declined to comment on the recordings, while the university stated it does not engage with unauthorized recordings or grant employees authority to represent ASU in such matters.
Ruiz emphasized the importance of this coverage for the ASU community, ensuring awareness of these investigative tactics and their implications for the university’s faculty and students.
